异氟醚麻醉前应用咪达唑仑与布托啡诺对小鼠麻醉效果影响评价
作者:
作者单位:

海南医学院第二附属医院麻醉科,海口 570311

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R-33

基金项目:


Anesthetic effects of premedication midazolam combined with butorphanol on isoflurane-anesthetized mice
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570311, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 观察小鼠异氟醚麻醉前接受咪达唑仑联合布托啡诺给药后的麻醉效果、内环境稳定,评价安全性。 方法 选择 75 只小鼠随机分为 3 组,分布为:对照组,仅予以小鼠异氟醚麻醉;观察组,小鼠异氟醚麻醉前 接受咪达唑仑联合布托啡诺给药;空白组,不予以小鼠任何麻醉处理。 每组 25 只。 分别于诱导即刻及诱导后 1 h 内每 5 min 测定心率及血氧饱和度(SpO2 )。 比较麻醉前、麻醉中各组小鼠血清血糖(Glu)及皮质醇(Cor)水平。 比较各组小鼠诱导和恢复时间、镇痛镇静效果等指标的差异。 比较诱导过程中各组不良反应发生率差异。 结果 与对照组相比,观察组诱导时间、镇静起效时间与疼痛消失时间显著较低(P<0. 05),而恢复时间无差异(P>0. 05)。 空白组心率高于对照组和观察组(P<0. 05);诱导后 5~ 35 min 时刻,对照组心率高于观察组(P<0. 05);诱导后 35~ 60 min 时刻,对照组心率低于观察组(P<0. 05)。 诱导后 1 h 对照组 SpO2 低于观察组及空白组(P<0. 05);观察组 及空白组 SpO2 无显著差异(P>0. 05)。 三组心率的变化趋势有差别(F= 15. 215,P= 0. 000)。 三组 SpO2 的变化趋势无差别(F= 1. 015,P= 0. 180)。 麻醉前三组 Cor、Glu 水平无统计学差异(P>0. 05);麻醉中对照组 Cor、Glu 水平高于空白组和观察组(P<0. 05),而空白组和观察组 Cor、Glu 水平无统计学差异(P>0. 05)。 对照组术中 Cor、Glu 较术前升高(P<0. 05),而空白组和观察组 Cor、Glu 水平无统计学差异(P>0. 05)。 对照组和观察组不良反应总发生率 无显著差异(P= 0. 626)。 结论 异氟醚麻醉前接受咪达唑仑联合布托啡诺给药后的麻醉效果确实,麻醉诱导平稳,呼吸抑制减轻,且安全性高。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the anesthetic effect and safety of premedication midazolam combined with butorphanol on isoflurane-anesthetized mice. Methods Seventy five mice were randomly divided into three groups of 25 mice: control group(receiving isoflurane anesthesia only), observation group(receiving premedication midazolam combined with butorphanol with isoflurane anesthesia)and blank group(receiving no anesthesia). The indices of heart rate(HR) and oxygen saturation(SpO2 )were assessed at induction and every 5 min post-induction for 1 h. The serum levels of glucose (Glu)and cortisol(Cor)were measured and compared pre- and post-induction. The indices of induction and recovery time, and analgesic and sedative time were measured and compared among the three groups. Adverse reactions during induction were also recorded. Results Compared with the control group, the indices of induction time, sedation onset time and pain- loss time were shorter in the observation group(P<0. 05), but the recovery time was no different(P>0. 05). The HR index in the blank group was the highest among the three groups(P<0. 05). The HR index of the control group was higher than that of the observation group during 5~ 35 min post-induction(P<0. 05), and the HR index of the control group was lower than that of the observation group during 35~ 60 min post-induction(P<0. 05). The SpO2 index of the control group was the lowest among the three groups after 1 h post-induction ( P < 0. 05), and the SpO2 index was not different between the observation and blank groups(P>0. 05). The HR variation tendency was different among the three groups(F= 15. 215, P= 0. 000). The SpO2 variation tendency was not different among the three groups(F= 1. 015, P= 0. 180). The serum levels of Glu and Cor were not different among the three groups pre-anesthesia(all P>0. 05). The serum levels of Glu and Cor in the control group were the highest among the three groups at mid-anesthesia(all P<0. 05), but no difference was found between the blank and observation groups at mid-anesthesia(all P>0. 05). The serum levels of Glu and Cor at mid-anesthesia were higher than at pre-anesthesia in the control group ( P< 0. 05), but the serum levels of Glu and Cor in the blank and observation groups were not different between pre-anesthesia and mid-anesthesia ( P> 0. 05). The incidences of adverse reactions were not different between control and observation groups(P= 0. 626). Conclusions The anesthetic effects of premedication midazolam combined with butorphanol on isoflurane-anesthetized mice are safe and reduce the degree of respiratory inhibition.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

韦雪梅,冯海妹,徐志新.异氟醚麻醉前应用咪达唑仑与布托啡诺对小鼠麻醉效果影响评价[J].中国比较医学杂志,2020,30(12):70~75.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-19
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-02-10
  • 出版日期:
自2024年1期开始,杂志参考文献改为中英文对照,具体格式要求可置下载中心查看!
关闭