基于层次分析法-熵权法的低等级生物安全实验室风险评估体系的构建
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.新疆医科大学公共卫生学院;2.新疆医科大学第五附属医院;3.新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院医学检验中心;4.新疆维吾尔自治区卫生健康委员会;5.新疆医科大学中医学院;6.新疆维吾尔自治区疾控中心(新疆维吾尔自治区预防医学科学院新疆维吾尔自治区公共卫生检验检测中心)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

]新疆维吾尔自治区科技创新团队(天山创新团队)(2022TSYCTD0015)


Combining AHP and Entropy Weight Method to Develop a Risk Assessment System for Low-level Biosafety Laboratories.
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Xinjiang Medical University;2.The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University;3.Medical Laboratory Center, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University;4.Health Commission of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region;5.School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University;6.School of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University;7.Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Academy of Preventive Medical Sciences (Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Center for Public Health Laboratory Testing)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【】 目的:生物技术的进步使得生物安全在公共卫生领域的重要性日益凸显。低等级生物安全实验室数量众多、应用广泛,是生物安全风险管理的关键环节,其潜在风险亟需得到有效控制与防范。研究方法:以医院、疾控、卫健长期从事一线生物安全实验室工作人员为研究对象,利用德尔菲法进行两轮匿名专家函询,再利用层次分析法结合熵权法进行组合赋权,最终得到主客观相结合的低等级生物安全实验室风险评估指标体系。结果:首轮纳入专家30名,第二轮纳入35名专家。经过两轮匿名的意见征集与反馈修订,最终构建了一套系统化的低等级生物安全实验室风险评估指标体系,包括5个一级指标(人员风险防控、设备安全管理、样本风险管理、实验室制度建设、实验室环境管理)、10个二级指标及30个三级指标。肯德尔和谐系数总体为0.23(P<0.001),各层次判断矩阵的一致性比率(CR)均小于0.1。结果表明,该评估体系构建过程科学严谨,专家意见协调性好,权重设置合理,可用于低等级生物安全实验室的实际风险评估与管理工作中。创新点及应用价值:基于 “人、机、样、法、环” 五个维度构建低等级生物安全实验室统一风险评估指标体系并量化指标权重,丰富了该领域标准化评估的相关研究;适用范围涵盖低等级生物安全实验室的日常风险管控、监管部门监督检查及相关学术研究等场景。

    Abstract:

    【】 Objective: Advances in biotechnology have increasingly highlighted the importance of biosafety within the field of public health. Low-level biosafety laboratories, due to their large numbers and wide range of applications, represent a critical link in biosafety risk management. There is an urgent need for the effective control and prevention of their potential risks.Methods: This study engaged front-line biosafety laboratory personnel from hospitals, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and health authorities as research subjects. A two-round anonymous expert consultation was conducted using the Delphi method. Subsequently, a combined weighting approach integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Entropy Weight Method was applied to establish a comprehensive risk assessment index system for low-level biosafety laboratories that incorporates both subjective and objective elements.Results: The first round of consultation involved 30 experts, and the second round involved 53 experts. Through two rounds of anonymous solicitation and iterative revision, a systematic risk assessment index system for low-level biosafety laboratories was finalized. This system comprises 5 first-level indicators (Personnel Risk Prevention, Equipment Safety Management, Specimen Risk Management, Laboratory System Construction, Laboratory Environment Management), 10 second-level indicators, and 30 third-level indicators. The overall Kendall"s coefficient of concordance was 0.23 (P < 0.001), and the consistency ratios (CR) of all judgment matrices were less than 0.1. These results indicate that the system development process was scientifically rigorous, expert opinions were well-coordinated, and the weight assignments are reliable, making the system suitable for practical risk assessment and management in low-level biosafety laboratories.Innovation and Application Value: Based on the five dimensions of "Personnel, Equipment, Specimen, System, and Environment," this study developed a unified risk assessment index system for low-level biosafety laboratories and quantified the indicator weights. This enriches research on standardized assessment in this field. The system is applicable to various scenarios, including daily risk control in laboratories, supervisory inspections by regulatory bodies, and related academic research.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-18
  • 最后修改日期:2026-03-31
  • 录用日期:2026-05-11
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: